Qureos Mentor

Palladium Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited

Ongoing Recruitment - (Junior National) - Logistics Officer – PPH Training Rollout

<div><div><div><div><b>Posted date</b></div> <div>4th June, 2026</div> <div><b>Last date to apply</b></div> <div>30th June, 2026</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Country</b></div> <div>Pakistan</div> <div><b>Locations</b></div> <div>Lahore</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Category</b></div> <div>Health Care
</div></div><br>
<div><div><b>Type</b></div> <div>Consultancy</div> <div><b>Position</b></div> <div>1</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Experience</b></div> <div>10 years</div></div></div></div>
<br><p></p><div><p><b>TA Title:</b> E4H Punjab TA: Refinement and Operationalisation of the Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) for Punjab Health Care Commission (PHCC)</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Programme</b></p>
<p>
Evidence for Health (E4H) is a Foreign, Commonwealth &amp; Development Office (FCDO)-funded programme aimed at strengthening Pakistan's healthcare system, thereby decreasing the burden of illness and saving lives. E4H (2023-2027) provides technical assistance (TA) to Punjab and also to the Federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) governments. The Punjab component is being implemented by Palladium along with Oxford Policy Management (OPM).</p>
<p>
Through its flexible, embedded, and demand-driven model, E4H Punjab will support the government to achieve a resilient health system that is prepared for health emergencies, responsive to the latest evidence, and delivers equitable, quality, and efficient healthcare services. Specifically, E4H will deliver TA across three outputs:</p>
<p><b>
Output 1: </b>Strengthened integrated health security, with a focus on preparing and responding to health emergencies, including pandemics.</p>
<p><b>
Output 2: </b>Strengthened evidence-based decision-making to drive health sector performance and accountability.</p>
<p><b>
Output 3: </b>Improved implementation of Universal Health Coverage, with a focus on ending preventable deaths.</p>
<p>
E4H-Punjab works in partnership with the Punjab Department of Health (DOH).</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Terms of reference</b></p>
<p><b>
Background</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The Punjab Healthcare Commission (PHCC) regulates healthcare establishments across the province through licensing, inspection, enforcement, and implementation of Minimum Service Delivery Standards (MSDS). The MSDS framework provides the minimum regulatory requirements that healthcare establishments must meet to operate safely and appropriately.</li>
<li>Under previous E4H technical assistance, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework was assessed across Category I and II healthcare establishments to understand how effectively minimum standards are being implemented and whether they are contributing to improved quality of care. As part of this assessment, a Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) was developed and tested in 59 facilities to complement MSDS compliance assessment. The HQI drew on internationally recognised healthcare quality dimensions (WHO, OECD) including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity, and was contextualised using PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory framework, MSDS requirements, facility assessment findings, and available service delivery data.</li>
<li>The assessment confirmed that MSDS remains an essential regulatory tool focused on assessing operational and process-related aspects of service delivery, but also showed that compliance with minimum standards does not always provide a complete picture of quality. Importantly, the relationship between MSDS compliance and HQI performance was found to be positive but not linear. Facilities with higher MSDS compliance generally performed better on HQI; however, some facilities achieved relatively strong outcome performance despite partial compliance, while others with high compliance did not consistently demonstrate equivalent outcome-level performance. The assessment therefore recommended that PHCC consider using a structured, outcome-based quality measurement approach alongside MSDS to support more nuanced facility performance review, benchmarking, and quality improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Problem Statement</b></p>
<p>
While PHCC has an established mechanism to assess minimum compliance through MSDS, it does not yet have an institutionalised approach to measure, compare, and track broader quality performance across public and private healthcare establishments. This limits its ability to identify variation in quality, prioritise regulatory follow-up based on risk and performance, and provide structured feedback to facilities for improvement beyond minimum standards.</p>
<p>
A refined and operationalised HQI is therefore needed to translate selected quality indicators into a practical scoring and benchmarking tool that can support PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory decision-making, facility quality improvement, and, over time, greater transparency for patients and providers.</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Goal and Objectives</b></p>
<p>
The overall objective of this TA is to refine, standardise and validate the HQI, building on its initial development and pilot application under the MSDS Impact Assessment, to strengthen PHC&rsquo;s capacity for performance-based monitoring and decision-making.</p>
<p><b>
Objectives</b></p>
<div>
<ul><li>To refine the existing HQI approach by building on the previous MSDS assessment, PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory mandate, recognised quality-of-care dimensions, and lessons from initial application of the HQI in Category I and II healthcare establishments.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To strengthen PHCC&rsquo;s capacity to assess quality beyond minimum compliance by developing a feasible approach for measuring, scoring, and comparing broader dimensions of healthcare quality, including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To test the practical use of the HQI within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions through a limited pilot that assesses feasibility, data availability, usability, and relevance for decision-making.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To recommend future institutionalisation and scale-up of the HQI by developing a practical roadmap that sets out how it may be used, maintained, reviewed, and progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing systems, subject to PHCC priorities, capacity, and decision-making.</li></ul>
</div>
<p><b>Strategic Approach</b></p>
<p><i>
Contributions to Health Systems Strengthening</i></p>
<p>
This TA aims to strengthen healthcare regulation and quality improvement in Punjab by supporting PHCC to move beyond minimum compliance monitoring towards a more performance-based approach to assessing healthcare quality. HQI will complement MSDS rather than replace it. The HQI will support evidence-based regulatory decision-making, risk-informed follow-up, facility feedback, benchmarking, and continuous quality improvement across private and public Category I and II healthcare establishments. Over time, it may also support hospital rating or public-facing quality information, contributing to greater transparency, patient choice, and healthy competition among providers.</p>
<p><i>
Alignment with Other E4H TAs / Investments</i></p>
<p>
This TA builds directly on the previous E4H-supported MSDS Impact Assessment conducted with PHCC, which tested an initial HQI model and recommended that PHCC complement MSDS compliance assessment with a broader quality measurement approach. The proposed TA therefore represents the next phase of support: moving from assessment and initial testing towards refinement, validation, operationalisation planning, and a practical pathway for institutional uptake of the HQI. The assignment also aligns with E4H&rsquo;s broader support to quality of care, evidence-based decision-making, health systems governance, and UHC by strengthening PHCC&rsquo;s ability to use regulatory and facility-level data for performance monitoring and quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>
Scope of Work and Methodology</b></p>
<p>
The TA will support PHCC to refine, validate, and prepare the HQI for practical application within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions.</p>
<p><i>
Phase 1: Inception, Review and Agreement on Practical Application
</i></p><ul><li>Conduct a rapid review of the previous MSDS Impact Assessment, the HQI model developed, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS tools, inspection processes, data systems, and relevant quality monitoring standards and practices.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the scope, workplan, timelines, roles, coordination arrangements, and PHCC focal points.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the intended institutional application and feasible use of the HQI, including its use for internal regulatory planning, facility performance review, targeted inspections, structured feedback to healthcare establishments, quality improvement, and potential future hospital rating or public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>Confirm pilot scope, facility categories, sampling principles, data sources, validation approach, dashboard expectations, and institutionalisation requirements.</li>
<li>Ensure the approach is agreed with PHCC from the outset and reflected in the Inception Report.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 2: Refinement of HQI Framework, Indicators, Scoring, and Benchmarking Approach</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Review and refine the HQI framework developed under the previous MSDS assessment, including quality domains, indicators, scoring logic, weighting, data requirements, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>Ensure the refined HQI reflects recognised quality dimensions and is aligned with international best practice, while remaining aligned with PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework and regulatory mandate.</li>
<li>Review indicators for relevance, measurability, data availability, reliability, and usefulness for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Develop a practical scoring and benchmarking approach using MSDS requirements, previous assessment findings, facility category/type, available data, and feasible performance thresholds.</li>
<li>Submit and validate the draft HQI framework, indicator matrix, scoring methodology, and benchmarking approach from PHCC.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 3: Limited Pilot Testing and Validation
</i></p><ul><li>Pilot the refined HQI in selected Category I and II healthcare establishments, with the sample and selection criteria agreed with PHCC during inception.</li>
<li>Test indicator feasibility, measurability, data availability, data verification requirements, scoring practicality, dashboard usability, and relevance for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Assess how the HQI can complement MSDS inspections and PHCC&rsquo;s existing regulatory processes without adding unnecessary burden to PHCC staff or healthcare establishments.</li>
<li>Gather feedback from PHCC teams and participating facilities on usability, interpretation, and practical value of HQI outputs.</li>
<li>Refine the indicator set, scoring approach, data requirements, dashboard structure, and implementation guidance based on pilot findings.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 4: Development of HQI Manual, User Guidance and Dashboard Prototype</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Co-develop and finalse a practical HQI package for PHCC, including the HQI manual, indicator definitions, scoring and aggregation rules, data source requirements, quality assurance checks, reporting formats, and user guidance.</li>
<li>Develop a simple dashboard prototype, in line with the approach agreed during inception.</li>
<li>Ensure the dashboard can present facility-level scores, domain-level performance, comparison across relevant facility categories, and priority areas for improvement.</li>
<li>Develop the dashboard as a practical, non-system-dependent tool or prototype for immediate use and future digital integration decisions.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 5: Finalisation and Integration Planning</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Work with PHCC to define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into existing regulatory, inspection, monitoring, and quality improvement processes.</li>
<li>Request PHCC to share HQI with health care commissions in other provinces as well as the Islamabad Healthcare Regulatory Authority (IHRA) in close coordination with the TWG at the federal level responsible for regular coordination of HCCs.</li>
<li>Develop an implementation roadmap setting out rollout steps, roles and responsibilities, PHCC ownership arrangements, review and update frequency, data management requirements, and facility feedback mechanisms.</li>
<li>Identify options for future use of HQI results, including internal regulatory planning, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information, subject to PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Define practical requirements for sustaining the HQI beyond the TA period, including staff capacity, governance arrangements, dashboard maintenance, future refinement of indicators, and alignment with PHCC systems.</li>
<li>Conduct a structured validation, orientation, and handover session with PHCC to support support future uptake and informed decision-making on continued use.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Sustainability and Institutionalisation</b></p>
<p>
Sustainability and institutionalization considerations will be built into the TA from inception.</p>
<ul>
<li>PHCC focal points and responsible units will be identified during inception to guide the refinement, piloting, validation, and institutionalisation of the HQI. The intended institutional use of the HQI, approval pathway, and integration into PHCC processes will also be agreed at this stage.</li>
<li>The HQI framework, indicator set, scoring methodology, benchmarking approach, dashboard prototype, manual, and implementation roadmap will be developed jointly with PHCC to ensure technical relevance, ownership, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>The TA will move from TA-led technical refinement during early stages, to co-led piloting and validation, and finally to PHCC-led application and review with TA backstopping. This phased approach will help ensure that PHCC staff are able to understand, apply, interpret, and update the HQI subject to PHCC&rsquo;s future adoption and resourcing decisions.</li>
<li>Orientation and hands-on support will be provided to relevant PHCC staff on HQI indicators, scoring, data requirements, dashboard use, interpretation of results, and facility feedback processes. The final roadmap will also identify any further training needs required for wider rollout.</li>
<li>The TA will define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing inspection, licensing, monitoring, quality assurance, facility feedback, and performance review processes, rather than creating a parallel quality monitoring mechanism.</li>
<li>The final stage will include structured handover of the HQI manual, indicator dictionary, scoring methodology, dashboard prototype, user guidance, and implementation roadmap. The roadmap will set out recommended rollout steps, timelines, responsible units, review frequency, dissemination approach, and options for future use of HQI results, including facility feedback, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>The HQI will be designed as a living tool that can be reviewed and refined over time based on PHCC experience, data availability, facility feedback, and evolving regulatory priorities. This will provide the foundation for progressive institutionalisation and potential long-term use beyond E4H technical assistance.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Deliverables</b></p>
<p>
The tentative timeline to implement all phases of the are 8 months. The deliverable requirements from consultants are as follows:</p>
<div>
<ul><li>Inception Slide Deck and Work Plan: Agreed scope, methodology, workplan, pilot approach, PHCC focal points, agreed use of HQI, data sources, dashboard expectations and institutionalisation pathway</li></ul>
<ul><li>Draft HQI Framework: Refined quality domains, indicator definitions and matrix, data sources, scoring/weighting methodology, benchmarking approach, and proposed dashboard structure.</li></ul>
<ul><li>Pilot Validation Report: Findings documented on feasibility, data availability, scoring practicality, usability, dashboard relevance, and PHCC/facility feedback. Revised HQI framework, indicators, scoring approach, and dashboard structure updated based on pilot findings.</li></ul>
<ul><li>HQI Manual, User Guide and Dashboard Design: Including indicator dictionary, scoring and benchmarking, user guidance, data quality checks, and dashboard prototype</li></ul>
<ul><li>Final Report and Implementation Roadmap: Roadmap to include rollout and institutionalisation steps, PHCC ownership arrangements, responsible units, review frequency, training needs, dissemination approach, approval pathways, and sustainability measures and requirements for conintinued use</li></ul>
</div>
<p></p><div><p><b>Position Title:</b><b> </b>Clinical &amp; Quality Measurement Specialist (Mid National)</p>
<p><b>
Duty Station: </b>Lahore (with travel as required)</p>
<p><b>
Duration / LOE:</b> July 2026 &ndash; February 2027 (LOE 112 days &ndash; subject to change until the start of the TA)</p>
<p><b>
Reporting To:</b> E4H Programme Punjab Team Lead &amp; Designated Provincial Coordinator; Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert</p>
<p><b>
Role Purpose</b></p>
<p>
Support development and validation of clinically relevant quality indicators and measurement approaches to ensure the HQI accurately reflects healthcare quality dimensions and service delivery realities.</p>
<p><b>
Key Roles &amp; Responsibilities</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Support refinement of HQI quality domains, indicators, and scoring methodologies.</li>
<li>Translate healthcare quality standards and MSDS requirements into measurable performance indicators.</li>
<li>Review indicator feasibility, data requirements, performance thresholds, and benchmarking approaches.</li>
<li>Support pilot implementation, validation exercises, and facility-level consultations.</li>
<li>Contribute to development of HQI manuals, user guidance, and implementation recommendations.</li>
<li>Provide technical inputs on patient safety, infection prevention and control, and quality assurance dimensions.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Requirements</b></p>
<p><i>
Technical Expertise</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Master&rsquo;s degree in Public Health, Epidemiology, Community Medicine, or related field.</li>
<li>At least 10 years of overall professional experience.</li>
<li>Experience in clinical governance, healthcare quality assurance, hospital management, or quality improvement initiatives.</li>
<li>Strong understanding of MSDS functional areas and healthcare service delivery standards.</li>
<li>Experience developing or applying healthcare quality indicators and compliance frameworks.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Core Competencies</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Ability to translate clinical standards into measurable indicators.</li>
<li>Strong analytical and technical writing skills.</li>
<li>Attention to detail and quality assurance orientation.</li>
<li>Strong stakeholder engagement skills.</li>
<li>Ability to contextualise indicators to operational realities.</li></ul></div></div><p></p>

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Mid Level National – Clinical & Quality Measurement Specialist

<div><div><div><div><b>Posted date</b></div> <div>4th June, 2026</div> <div><b>Last date to apply</b></div> <div>30th June, 2026</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Country</b></div> <div>Pakistan</div> <div><b>Locations</b></div> <div>Lahore</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Category</b></div> <div>Health Care
</div></div><br>
<div><div><b>Type</b></div> <div>Consultancy</div><div></div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Experience</b></div> <div>5 years</div></div></div></div>
<br><p></p><div><p><b>TA Title:</b> E4H Punjab TA: Refinement and Operationalisation of the Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) for Punjab Health Care Commission (PHCC)</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Programme</b></p>
<p>
Evidence for Health (E4H) is a Foreign, Commonwealth &amp; Development Office (FCDO)-funded programme aimed at strengthening Pakistan's healthcare system, thereby decreasing the burden of illness and saving lives. E4H (2023-2027) provides technical assistance (TA) to Punjab and also to the Federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) governments. The Punjab component is being implemented by Palladium along with Oxford Policy Management (OPM).</p>
<p>
Through its flexible, embedded, and demand-driven model, E4H Punjab will support the government to achieve a resilient health system that is prepared for health emergencies, responsive to the latest evidence, and delivers equitable, quality, and efficient healthcare services. Specifically, E4H will deliver TA across three outputs:</p>
<p><b>
Output 1: </b>Strengthened integrated health security, with a focus on preparing and responding to health emergencies, including pandemics.</p>
<p><b>
Output 2: </b>Strengthened evidence-based decision-making to drive health sector performance and accountability.</p>
<p><b>
Output 3: </b>Improved implementation of Universal Health Coverage, with a focus on ending preventable deaths.</p>
<p>
E4H-Punjab works in partnership with the Punjab Department of Health (DOH).</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Terms of reference</b></p>
<p><b>
Background</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The Punjab Healthcare Commission (PHCC) regulates healthcare establishments across the province through licensing, inspection, enforcement, and implementation of Minimum Service Delivery Standards (MSDS). The MSDS framework provides the minimum regulatory requirements that healthcare establishments must meet to operate safely and appropriately.</li>
<li>Under previous E4H technical assistance, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework was assessed across Category I and II healthcare establishments to understand how effectively minimum standards are being implemented and whether they are contributing to improved quality of care. As part of this assessment, a Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) was developed and tested in 59 facilities to complement MSDS compliance assessment. The HQI drew on internationally recognised healthcare quality dimensions (WHO, OECD) including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity, and was contextualised using PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory framework, MSDS requirements, facility assessment findings, and available service delivery data.</li>
<li>The assessment confirmed that MSDS remains an essential regulatory tool focused on assessing operational and process-related aspects of service delivery, but also showed that compliance with minimum standards does not always provide a complete picture of quality. Importantly, the relationship between MSDS compliance and HQI performance was found to be positive but not linear. Facilities with higher MSDS compliance generally performed better on HQI; however, some facilities achieved relatively strong outcome performance despite partial compliance, while others with high compliance did not consistently demonstrate equivalent outcome-level performance. The assessment therefore recommended that PHCC consider using a structured, outcome-based quality measurement approach alongside MSDS to support more nuanced facility performance review, benchmarking, and quality improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Problem Statement</b></p>
<p>
While PHCC has an established mechanism to assess minimum compliance through MSDS, it does not yet have an institutionalised approach to measure, compare, and track broader quality performance across public and private healthcare establishments. This limits its ability to identify variation in quality, prioritise regulatory follow-up based on risk and performance, and provide structured feedback to facilities for improvement beyond minimum standards.</p>
<p>
A refined and operationalised HQI is therefore needed to translate selected quality indicators into a practical scoring and benchmarking tool that can support PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory decision-making, facility quality improvement, and, over time, greater transparency for patients and providers.</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Goal and Objectives</b></p>
<p>
The overall objective of this TA is to refine, standardise and validate the HQI, building on its initial development and pilot application under the MSDS Impact Assessment, to strengthen PHC&rsquo;s capacity for performance-based monitoring and decision-making.</p>
<p><b>
Objectives</b></p>
<div>
<ul><li>To refine the existing HQI approach by building on the previous MSDS assessment, PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory mandate, recognised quality-of-care dimensions, and lessons from initial application of the HQI in Category I and II healthcare establishments.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To strengthen PHCC&rsquo;s capacity to assess quality beyond minimum compliance by developing a feasible approach for measuring, scoring, and comparing broader dimensions of healthcare quality, including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To test the practical use of the HQI within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions through a limited pilot that assesses feasibility, data availability, usability, and relevance for decision-making.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To recommend future institutionalisation and scale-up of the HQI by developing a practical roadmap that sets out how it may be used, maintained, reviewed, and progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing systems, subject to PHCC priorities, capacity, and decision-making.</li></ul>
</div>
<p><b>Strategic Approach</b></p>
<p><i>
Contributions to Health Systems Strengthening</i></p>
<p>
This TA aims to strengthen healthcare regulation and quality improvement in Punjab by supporting PHCC to move beyond minimum compliance monitoring towards a more performance-based approach to assessing healthcare quality. HQI will complement MSDS rather than replace it. The HQI will support evidence-based regulatory decision-making, risk-informed follow-up, facility feedback, benchmarking, and continuous quality improvement across private and public Category I and II healthcare establishments. Over time, it may also support hospital rating or public-facing quality information, contributing to greater transparency, patient choice, and healthy competition among providers.</p>
<p><i>
Alignment with Other E4H TAs / Investments</i></p>
<p>
This TA builds directly on the previous E4H-supported MSDS Impact Assessment conducted with PHCC, which tested an initial HQI model and recommended that PHCC complement MSDS compliance assessment with a broader quality measurement approach. The proposed TA therefore represents the next phase of support: moving from assessment and initial testing towards refinement, validation, operationalisation planning, and a practical pathway for institutional uptake of the HQI. The assignment also aligns with E4H&rsquo;s broader support to quality of care, evidence-based decision-making, health systems governance, and UHC by strengthening PHCC&rsquo;s ability to use regulatory and facility-level data for performance monitoring and quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>
Scope of Work and Methodology</b></p>
<p>
The TA will support PHCC to refine, validate, and prepare the HQI for practical application within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions.</p>
<p><i>
Phase 1: Inception, Review and Agreement on Practical Application
</i></p><ul><li>Conduct a rapid review of the previous MSDS Impact Assessment, the HQI model developed, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS tools, inspection processes, data systems, and relevant quality monitoring standards and practices.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the scope, workplan, timelines, roles, coordination arrangements, and PHCC focal points.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the intended institutional application and feasible use of the HQI, including its use for internal regulatory planning, facility performance review, targeted inspections, structured feedback to healthcare establishments, quality improvement, and potential future hospital rating or public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>Confirm pilot scope, facility categories, sampling principles, data sources, validation approach, dashboard expectations, and institutionalisation requirements.</li>
<li>Ensure the approach is agreed with PHCC from the outset and reflected in the Inception Report.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 2: Refinement of HQI Framework, Indicators, Scoring, and Benchmarking Approach</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Review and refine the HQI framework developed under the previous MSDS assessment, including quality domains, indicators, scoring logic, weighting, data requirements, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>Ensure the refined HQI reflects recognised quality dimensions and is aligned with international best practice, while remaining aligned with PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework and regulatory mandate.</li>
<li>Review indicators for relevance, measurability, data availability, reliability, and usefulness for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Develop a practical scoring and benchmarking approach using MSDS requirements, previous assessment findings, facility category/type, available data, and feasible performance thresholds.</li>
<li>Submit and validate the draft HQI framework, indicator matrix, scoring methodology, and benchmarking approach from PHCC.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 3: Limited Pilot Testing and Validation
</i></p><ul><li>Pilot the refined HQI in selected Category I and II healthcare establishments, with the sample and selection criteria agreed with PHCC during inception.</li>
<li>Test indicator feasibility, measurability, data availability, data verification requirements, scoring practicality, dashboard usability, and relevance for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Assess how the HQI can complement MSDS inspections and PHCC&rsquo;s existing regulatory processes without adding unnecessary burden to PHCC staff or healthcare establishments.</li>
<li>Gather feedback from PHCC teams and participating facilities on usability, interpretation, and practical value of HQI outputs.</li>
<li>Refine the indicator set, scoring approach, data requirements, dashboard structure, and implementation guidance based on pilot findings.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 4: Development of HQI Manual, User Guidance and Dashboard Prototype</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Co-develop and finalse a practical HQI package for PHCC, including the HQI manual, indicator definitions, scoring and aggregation rules, data source requirements, quality assurance checks, reporting formats, and user guidance.</li>
<li>Develop a simple dashboard prototype, in line with the approach agreed during inception.</li>
<li>Ensure the dashboard can present facility-level scores, domain-level performance, comparison across relevant facility categories, and priority areas for improvement.</li>
<li>Develop the dashboard as a practical, non-system-dependent tool or prototype for immediate use and future digital integration decisions.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 5: Finalisation and Integration Planning</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Work with PHCC to define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into existing regulatory, inspection, monitoring, and quality improvement processes.</li>
<li>Request PHCC to share HQI with health care commissions in other provinces as well as the Islamabad Healthcare Regulatory Authority (IHRA) in close coordination with the TWG at the federal level responsible for regular coordination of HCCs.</li>
<li>Develop an implementation roadmap setting out rollout steps, roles and responsibilities, PHCC ownership arrangements, review and update frequency, data management requirements, and facility feedback mechanisms.</li>
<li>Identify options for future use of HQI results, including internal regulatory planning, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information, subject to PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Define practical requirements for sustaining the HQI beyond the TA period, including staff capacity, governance arrangements, dashboard maintenance, future refinement of indicators, and alignment with PHCC systems.</li>
<li>Conduct a structured validation, orientation, and handover session with PHCC to support support future uptake and informed decision-making on continued use.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Sustainability and Institutionalisation</b></p>
<p>
Sustainability and institutionalization considerations will be built into the TA from inception.</p>
<ul>
<li>PHCC focal points and responsible units will be identified during inception to guide the refinement, piloting, validation, and institutionalisation of the HQI. The intended institutional use of the HQI, approval pathway, and integration into PHCC processes will also be agreed at this stage.</li>
<li>The HQI framework, indicator set, scoring methodology, benchmarking approach, dashboard prototype, manual, and implementation roadmap will be developed jointly with PHCC to ensure technical relevance, ownership, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>The TA will move from TA-led technical refinement during early stages, to co-led piloting and validation, and finally to PHCC-led application and review with TA backstopping. This phased approach will help ensure that PHCC staff are able to understand, apply, interpret, and update the HQI subject to PHCC&rsquo;s future adoption and resourcing decisions.</li>
<li>Orientation and hands-on support will be provided to relevant PHCC staff on HQI indicators, scoring, data requirements, dashboard use, interpretation of results, and facility feedback processes. The final roadmap will also identify any further training needs required for wider rollout.</li>
<li>The TA will define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing inspection, licensing, monitoring, quality assurance, facility feedback, and performance review processes, rather than creating a parallel quality monitoring mechanism.</li>
<li>The final stage will include structured handover of the HQI manual, indicator dictionary, scoring methodology, dashboard prototype, user guidance, and implementation roadmap. The roadmap will set out recommended rollout steps, timelines, responsible units, review frequency, dissemination approach, and options for future use of HQI results, including facility feedback, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>The HQI will be designed as a living tool that can be reviewed and refined over time based on PHCC experience, data availability, facility feedback, and evolving regulatory priorities. This will provide the foundation for progressive institutionalisation and potential long-term use beyond E4H technical assistance.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Deliverables</b></p>
<p>
The tentative timeline to implement all phases of the are 8 months. The deliverable requirements from consultants are as follows:</p>
<div>
<ul><li>Inception Slide Deck and Work Plan: Agreed scope, methodology, workplan, pilot approach, PHCC focal points, agreed use of HQI, data sources, dashboard expectations and institutionalisation pathway</li></ul>
<ul><li>Draft HQI Framework: Refined quality domains, indicator definitions and matrix, data sources, scoring/weighting methodology, benchmarking approach, and proposed dashboard structure.</li></ul>
<ul><li>Pilot Validation Report: Findings documented on feasibility, data availability, scoring practicality, usability, dashboard relevance, and PHCC/facility feedback. Revised HQI framework, indicators, scoring approach, and dashboard structure updated based on pilot findings.</li></ul>
<ul><li>HQI Manual, User Guide and Dashboard Design: Including indicator dictionary, scoring and benchmarking, user guidance, data quality checks, and dashboard prototype</li></ul>
<ul><li>Final Report and Implementation Roadmap: Roadmap to include rollout and institutionalisation steps, PHCC ownership arrangements, responsible units, review frequency, training needs, dissemination approach, approval pathways, and sustainability measures and requirements for conintinued use</li></ul>
</div>
<p></p><p><b>Position Title:</b><b> </b>Research Associate (Junior National) &ndash; 2 Positions</p>
<p><b>
Duty Station:</b> Lahore (with travel as required)</p>
<p><b>
Duration / LOE:</b> July 2026 &ndash; February 2027 (LOE 128 days each &ndash; subject to change until the start of the TA)</p>
<p><b>
Reporting To:</b> E4H Programme Punjab Team Lead &amp; Designated Provincial Coordinator; Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert</p>
<p><b>
Role Purpose</b></p>
<p>
Provide analytical, research, documentation, and operational support for HQI refinement, validation, pilot implementation, and reporting activities.</p>
<p><b>
Key Roles &amp; Responsibilities</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Support literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and indicator development activities.</li>
<li>Assist in data compilation, analysis, validation exercises, and pilot implementation.</li>
<li>Support field engagement, stakeholder consultations, and workshop coordination.</li>
<li>Contribute to preparation of reports, presentations, manuals, and technical documentation.</li>
<li>Maintain documentation, trackers, meeting records, and supporting evidence for deliverables.</li>
<li>Assist in analysis of pilot findings and preparation of final recommendations.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Requirements</b></p>
<p><i>
Technical Expertise</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Bachelor&rsquo;s or Master&rsquo;s degree in Public Health, Statistics, Social Sciences, Economics, Administration, Bioinformatics, or related field.</li>
<li>At least 5 years of overall professional experience.</li>
<li>Experience in health systems research, monitoring and evaluation, data analysis, or programme support roles.</li>
<li>Experience in literature reviews, report writing, and data compilation.</li>
<li>Familiarity with healthcare quality, regulatory systems, or health service delivery is an advantage.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Core Competencies</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Strong data management and documentation skills.</li>
<li>Attention to detail and quality assurance orientation.</li>
<li>Ability to support multi-source data collection and analysis.</li>
<li>Strong coordination and teamwork skills.</li>
<li>Ability to synthesise findings into concise reports and presentations.</li></ul></div><p></p>

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Junior Level National – Research Associate

<div><div><div><div><b>Posted date</b></div> <div>4th June, 2026</div> <div><b>Last date to apply</b></div> <div>30th June, 2026</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Country</b></div> <div>Pakistan</div> <div><b>Locations</b></div> <div>lahore</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Category</b></div> <div>Health Care
</div></div><br>
<div><div><b>Type</b></div> <div>Consultancy</div> <div><b>Position</b></div> <div>1</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Experience</b></div> <div>10 years</div></div></div></div>
<br><p></p><div><p><b>TA Title:</b> E4H Punjab TA: Refinement and Operationalisation of the Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) for Punjab Health Care Commission (PHCC)</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Programme</b></p>
<p>
Evidence for Health (E4H) is a Foreign, Commonwealth &amp; Development Office (FCDO)-funded programme aimed at strengthening Pakistan's healthcare system, thereby decreasing the burden of illness and saving lives. E4H (2023-2027) provides technical assistance (TA) to Punjab and also to the Federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) governments. The Punjab component is being implemented by Palladium along with Oxford Policy Management (OPM).</p>
<p>
Through its flexible, embedded, and demand-driven model, E4H Punjab will support the government to achieve a resilient health system that is prepared for health emergencies, responsive to the latest evidence, and delivers equitable, quality, and efficient healthcare services. Specifically, E4H will deliver TA across three outputs:</p>
<p><b>
Output 1: </b>Strengthened integrated health security, with a focus on preparing and responding to health emergencies, including pandemics.</p>
<p><b>
Output 2: </b>Strengthened evidence-based decision-making to drive health sector performance and accountability.</p>
<p><b>
Output 3: </b>Improved implementation of Universal Health Coverage, with a focus on ending preventable deaths.</p>
<p>
E4H-Punjab works in partnership with the Punjab Department of Health (DOH).</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Terms of reference</b></p>
<p><b>
Background</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The Punjab Healthcare Commission (PHCC) regulates healthcare establishments across the province through licensing, inspection, enforcement, and implementation of Minimum Service Delivery Standards (MSDS). The MSDS framework provides the minimum regulatory requirements that healthcare establishments must meet to operate safely and appropriately.</li>
<li>Under previous E4H technical assistance, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework was assessed across Category I and II healthcare establishments to understand how effectively minimum standards are being implemented and whether they are contributing to improved quality of care. As part of this assessment, a Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) was developed and tested in 59 facilities to complement MSDS compliance assessment. The HQI drew on internationally recognised healthcare quality dimensions (WHO, OECD) including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity, and was contextualised using PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory framework, MSDS requirements, facility assessment findings, and available service delivery data.</li>
<li>The assessment confirmed that MSDS remains an essential regulatory tool focused on assessing operational and process-related aspects of service delivery, but also showed that compliance with minimum standards does not always provide a complete picture of quality. Importantly, the relationship between MSDS compliance and HQI performance was found to be positive but not linear. Facilities with higher MSDS compliance generally performed better on HQI; however, some facilities achieved relatively strong outcome performance despite partial compliance, while others with high compliance did not consistently demonstrate equivalent outcome-level performance. The assessment therefore recommended that PHCC consider using a structured, outcome-based quality measurement approach alongside MSDS to support more nuanced facility performance review, benchmarking, and quality improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Problem Statement</b></p>
<p>
While PHCC has an established mechanism to assess minimum compliance through MSDS, it does not yet have an institutionalised approach to measure, compare, and track broader quality performance across public and private healthcare establishments. This limits its ability to identify variation in quality, prioritise regulatory follow-up based on risk and performance, and provide structured feedback to facilities for improvement beyond minimum standards.</p>
<p>
A refined and operationalised HQI is therefore needed to translate selected quality indicators into a practical scoring and benchmarking tool that can support PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory decision-making, facility quality improvement, and, over time, greater transparency for patients and providers.</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Goal and Objectives</b></p>
<p>
The overall objective of this TA is to refine, standardise and validate the HQI, building on its initial development and pilot application under the MSDS Impact Assessment, to strengthen PHC&rsquo;s capacity for performance-based monitoring and decision-making.</p>
<p><b>
Objectives</b></p>
<div>
<ul><li>To refine the existing HQI approach by building on the previous MSDS assessment, PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory mandate, recognised quality-of-care dimensions, and lessons from initial application of the HQI in Category I and II healthcare establishments.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To strengthen PHCC&rsquo;s capacity to assess quality beyond minimum compliance by developing a feasible approach for measuring, scoring, and comparing broader dimensions of healthcare quality, including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To test the practical use of the HQI within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions through a limited pilot that assesses feasibility, data availability, usability, and relevance for decision-making.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To recommend future institutionalisation and scale-up of the HQI by developing a practical roadmap that sets out how it may be used, maintained, reviewed, and progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing systems, subject to PHCC priorities, capacity, and decision-making.</li></ul>
</div>
<p><b>Strategic Approach</b></p>
<p><i>
Contributions to Health Systems Strengthening</i></p>
<p>
This TA aims to strengthen healthcare regulation and quality improvement in Punjab by supporting PHCC to move beyond minimum compliance monitoring towards a more performance-based approach to assessing healthcare quality. HQI will complement MSDS rather than replace it. The HQI will support evidence-based regulatory decision-making, risk-informed follow-up, facility feedback, benchmarking, and continuous quality improvement across private and public Category I and II healthcare establishments. Over time, it may also support hospital rating or public-facing quality information, contributing to greater transparency, patient choice, and healthy competition among providers.</p>
<p><i>
Alignment with Other E4H TAs / Investments</i></p>
<p>
This TA builds directly on the previous E4H-supported MSDS Impact Assessment conducted with PHCC, which tested an initial HQI model and recommended that PHCC complement MSDS compliance assessment with a broader quality measurement approach. The proposed TA therefore represents the next phase of support: moving from assessment and initial testing towards refinement, validation, operationalisation planning, and a practical pathway for institutional uptake of the HQI. The assignment also aligns with E4H&rsquo;s broader support to quality of care, evidence-based decision-making, health systems governance, and UHC by strengthening PHCC&rsquo;s ability to use regulatory and facility-level data for performance monitoring and quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>
Scope of Work and Methodology</b></p>
<p>
The TA will support PHCC to refine, validate, and prepare the HQI for practical application within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions.</p>
<p><i>
Phase 1: Inception, Review and Agreement on Practical Application
</i></p><ul><li>Conduct a rapid review of the previous MSDS Impact Assessment, the HQI model developed, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS tools, inspection processes, data systems, and relevant quality monitoring standards and practices.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the scope, workplan, timelines, roles, coordination arrangements, and PHCC focal points.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the intended institutional application and feasible use of the HQI, including its use for internal regulatory planning, facility performance review, targeted inspections, structured feedback to healthcare establishments, quality improvement, and potential future hospital rating or public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>Confirm pilot scope, facility categories, sampling principles, data sources, validation approach, dashboard expectations, and institutionalisation requirements.</li>
<li>Ensure the approach is agreed with PHCC from the outset and reflected in the Inception Report.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 2: Refinement of HQI Framework, Indicators, Scoring, and Benchmarking Approach</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Review and refine the HQI framework developed under the previous MSDS assessment, including quality domains, indicators, scoring logic, weighting, data requirements, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>Ensure the refined HQI reflects recognised quality dimensions and is aligned with international best practice, while remaining aligned with PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework and regulatory mandate.</li>
<li>Review indicators for relevance, measurability, data availability, reliability, and usefulness for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Develop a practical scoring and benchmarking approach using MSDS requirements, previous assessment findings, facility category/type, available data, and feasible performance thresholds.</li>
<li>Submit and validate the draft HQI framework, indicator matrix, scoring methodology, and benchmarking approach from PHCC.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 3: Limited Pilot Testing and Validation
</i></p><ul><li>Pilot the refined HQI in selected Category I and II healthcare establishments, with the sample and selection criteria agreed with PHCC during inception.</li>
<li>Test indicator feasibility, measurability, data availability, data verification requirements, scoring practicality, dashboard usability, and relevance for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Assess how the HQI can complement MSDS inspections and PHCC&rsquo;s existing regulatory processes without adding unnecessary burden to PHCC staff or healthcare establishments.</li>
<li>Gather feedback from PHCC teams and participating facilities on usability, interpretation, and practical value of HQI outputs.</li>
<li>Refine the indicator set, scoring approach, data requirements, dashboard structure, and implementation guidance based on pilot findings.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 4: Development of HQI Manual, User Guidance and Dashboard Prototype</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Co-develop and finalse a practical HQI package for PHCC, including the HQI manual, indicator definitions, scoring and aggregation rules, data source requirements, quality assurance checks, reporting formats, and user guidance.</li>
<li>Develop a simple dashboard prototype, in line with the approach agreed during inception.</li>
<li>Ensure the dashboard can present facility-level scores, domain-level performance, comparison across relevant facility categories, and priority areas for improvement.</li>
<li>Develop the dashboard as a practical, non-system-dependent tool or prototype for immediate use and future digital integration decisions.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 5: Finalisation and Integration Planning</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Work with PHCC to define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into existing regulatory, inspection, monitoring, and quality improvement processes.</li>
<li>Request PHCC to share HQI with health care commissions in other provinces as well as the Islamabad Healthcare Regulatory Authority (IHRA) in close coordination with the TWG at the federal level responsible for regular coordination of HCCs.</li>
<li>Develop an implementation roadmap setting out rollout steps, roles and responsibilities, PHCC ownership arrangements, review and update frequency, data management requirements, and facility feedback mechanisms.</li>
<li>Identify options for future use of HQI results, including internal regulatory planning, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information, subject to PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Define practical requirements for sustaining the HQI beyond the TA period, including staff capacity, governance arrangements, dashboard maintenance, future refinement of indicators, and alignment with PHCC systems.</li>
<li>Conduct a structured validation, orientation, and handover session with PHCC to support support future uptake and informed decision-making on continued use.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Sustainability and Institutionalisation</b></p>
<p>
Sustainability and institutionalization considerations will be built into the TA from inception.</p>
<ul>
<li>PHCC focal points and responsible units will be identified during inception to guide the refinement, piloting, validation, and institutionalisation of the HQI. The intended institutional use of the HQI, approval pathway, and integration into PHCC processes will also be agreed at this stage.</li>
<li>The HQI framework, indicator set, scoring methodology, benchmarking approach, dashboard prototype, manual, and implementation roadmap will be developed jointly with PHCC to ensure technical relevance, ownership, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>The TA will move from TA-led technical refinement during early stages, to co-led piloting and validation, and finally to PHCC-led application and review with TA backstopping. This phased approach will help ensure that PHCC staff are able to understand, apply, interpret, and update the HQI subject to PHCC&rsquo;s future adoption and resourcing decisions.</li>
<li>Orientation and hands-on support will be provided to relevant PHCC staff on HQI indicators, scoring, data requirements, dashboard use, interpretation of results, and facility feedback processes. The final roadmap will also identify any further training needs required for wider rollout.</li>
<li>The TA will define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing inspection, licensing, monitoring, quality assurance, facility feedback, and performance review processes, rather than creating a parallel quality monitoring mechanism.</li>
<li>The final stage will include structured handover of the HQI manual, indicator dictionary, scoring methodology, dashboard prototype, user guidance, and implementation roadmap. The roadmap will set out recommended rollout steps, timelines, responsible units, review frequency, dissemination approach, and options for future use of HQI results, including facility feedback, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>The HQI will be designed as a living tool that can be reviewed and refined over time based on PHCC experience, data availability, facility feedback, and evolving regulatory priorities. This will provide the foundation for progressive institutionalisation and potential long-term use beyond E4H technical assistance.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Deliverables</b></p>
<p>
The tentative timeline to implement all phases of the are 8 months. The deliverable requirements from consultants are as follows:</p>
<div>
<ul><li>Inception Slide Deck and Work Plan: Agreed scope, methodology, workplan, pilot approach, PHCC focal points, agreed use of HQI, data sources, dashboard expectations and institutionalisation pathway</li></ul>
<ul><li>Draft HQI Framework: Refined quality domains, indicator definitions and matrix, data sources, scoring/weighting methodology, benchmarking approach, and proposed dashboard structure.</li></ul>
<ul><li>Pilot Validation Report: Findings documented on feasibility, data availability, scoring practicality, usability, dashboard relevance, and PHCC/facility feedback. Revised HQI framework, indicators, scoring approach, and dashboard structure updated based on pilot findings.</li></ul>
<ul><li>HQI Manual, User Guide and Dashboard Design: Including indicator dictionary, scoring and benchmarking, user guidance, data quality checks, and dashboard prototype</li></ul>
<ul><li>Final Report and Implementation Roadmap: Roadmap to include rollout and institutionalisation steps, PHCC ownership arrangements, responsible units, review frequency, training needs, dissemination approach, approval pathways, and sustainability measures and requirements for conintinued use</li></ul>
</div>
<p></p><div><p><b>Position Title:</b><b> </b>Data / Dashboard &amp; Digital Specialist (Mid National)</p>
<p><b>
Duty Station:</b> Lahore (with travel as required)</p>
<p><b>
Duration / LOE: </b>July 2026 &ndash; February 2027 (LOE 112 days &ndash; subject to change until the start of the TA)</p>
<p><b>
Reporting To: </b>E4H Programme Punjab Team Lead &amp; Designated Provincial Coordinator; Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert</p>
<p><b>
Role Purpose</b></p>
<p>
Support refinement of HQI data structures, scoring methodologies, visualisation approaches, and dashboard design to facilitate practical performance monitoring and decision-making.</p>
<p><b>
Key Roles &amp; Responsibilities</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Support refinement of HQI scoring structures, data architecture, and reporting formats.</li>
<li>Develop dashboard prototypes and performance visualisation tools for facility-level and comparative monitoring.</li>
<li>Design data structures, indicator aggregation approaches, and benchmarking formats.</li>
<li>Support validation of dashboard usability and reporting requirements during pilot implementation.</li>
<li>Provide technical guidance on future digital integration options and sustainability considerations.</li>
<li>Contribute to HQI manuals, user guidance, and implementation documentation.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Requirements</b></p>
<p><i>
Technical Expertise</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Bachelor&rsquo;s or Master&rsquo;s degree in Computer Science, Health Informatics, Data Science, or related field.</li>
<li>At least 10 years of overall professional experience.</li>
<li>Experience in data systems design, analytics, performance monitoring, and visualisation.</li>
<li>Experience with dashboard design tools such as Power BI, Tableau, DHIS2, ODK, or similar platforms.</li>
<li>Strong understanding of scoring systems, data architecture, and index development.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Core Competencies</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Strong data architecture and systems thinking.</li>
<li>Dashboard design and data visualisation skills.</li>
<li>Ability to simplify complex data into actionable insights.</li>
<li>Analytical problem-solving skills.</li>
<li>Ability to communicate technical concepts to non-technical audiences.</li></ul></div></div><p></p>

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Mid Level National – Data / Dashboard & Digital Specialist

<div><div><div><div><b>Posted date</b></div> <div>4th June, 2026</div> <div><b>Last date to apply</b></div> <div>30th June, 2026</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Country</b></div> <div>Pakistan</div> <div><b>Locations</b></div> <div>Lahore</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Category</b></div> <div>Health Care
</div></div><br>
<div><div><b>Type</b></div> <div>Consultancy</div> <div><b>Position</b></div> <div>1</div>
</div><br>
<div><div><b>Experience</b></div> <div>15 years</div></div></div></div>
<br><p></p><div><p><b>TA Title:</b> E4H Punjab TA: Refinement and Operationalisation of the Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) for Punjab Health Care Commission (PHCC)</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Programme</b></p>
<p>
Evidence for Health (E4H) is a Foreign, Commonwealth &amp; Development Office (FCDO)-funded programme aimed at strengthening Pakistan's healthcare system, thereby decreasing the burden of illness and saving lives. E4H (2023-2027) provides technical assistance (TA) to Punjab and also to the Federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) governments. The Punjab component is being implemented by Palladium along with Oxford Policy Management (OPM).</p>
<p>
Through its flexible, embedded, and demand-driven model, E4H Punjab will support the government to achieve a resilient health system that is prepared for health emergencies, responsive to the latest evidence, and delivers equitable, quality, and efficient healthcare services. Specifically, E4H will deliver TA across three outputs:</p>
<p><b>
Output 1: </b>Strengthened integrated health security, with a focus on preparing and responding to health emergencies, including pandemics.</p>
<p><b>
Output 2: </b>Strengthened evidence-based decision-making to drive health sector performance and accountability.</p>
<p><b>
Output 3: </b>Improved implementation of Universal Health Coverage, with a focus on ending preventable deaths.</p>
<p>
E4H-Punjab works in partnership with the Punjab Department of Health (DOH).</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Terms of reference</b></p>
<p><b>
Background</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The Punjab Healthcare Commission (PHCC) regulates healthcare establishments across the province through licensing, inspection, enforcement, and implementation of Minimum Service Delivery Standards (MSDS). The MSDS framework provides the minimum regulatory requirements that healthcare establishments must meet to operate safely and appropriately.</li>
<li>Under previous E4H technical assistance, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework was assessed across Category I and II healthcare establishments to understand how effectively minimum standards are being implemented and whether they are contributing to improved quality of care. As part of this assessment, a Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) was developed and tested in 59 facilities to complement MSDS compliance assessment. The HQI drew on internationally recognised healthcare quality dimensions (WHO, OECD) including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity, and was contextualised using PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory framework, MSDS requirements, facility assessment findings, and available service delivery data.</li>
<li>The assessment confirmed that MSDS remains an essential regulatory tool focused on assessing operational and process-related aspects of service delivery, but also showed that compliance with minimum standards does not always provide a complete picture of quality. Importantly, the relationship between MSDS compliance and HQI performance was found to be positive but not linear. Facilities with higher MSDS compliance generally performed better on HQI; however, some facilities achieved relatively strong outcome performance despite partial compliance, while others with high compliance did not consistently demonstrate equivalent outcome-level performance. The assessment therefore recommended that PHCC consider using a structured, outcome-based quality measurement approach alongside MSDS to support more nuanced facility performance review, benchmarking, and quality improvement.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Problem Statement</b></p>
<p>
While PHCC has an established mechanism to assess minimum compliance through MSDS, it does not yet have an institutionalised approach to measure, compare, and track broader quality performance across public and private healthcare establishments. This limits its ability to identify variation in quality, prioritise regulatory follow-up based on risk and performance, and provide structured feedback to facilities for improvement beyond minimum standards.</p>
<p>
A refined and operationalised HQI is therefore needed to translate selected quality indicators into a practical scoring and benchmarking tool that can support PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory decision-making, facility quality improvement, and, over time, greater transparency for patients and providers.</p>
<p></p>
<p><b>Goal and Objectives</b></p>
<p>
The overall objective of this TA is to refine, standardise and validate the HQI, building on its initial development and pilot application under the MSDS Impact Assessment, to strengthen PHC&rsquo;s capacity for performance-based monitoring and decision-making.</p>
<p><b>
Objectives</b></p>
<div>
<ul><li>To refine the existing HQI approach by building on the previous MSDS assessment, PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory mandate, recognised quality-of-care dimensions, and lessons from initial application of the HQI in Category I and II healthcare establishments.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To strengthen PHCC&rsquo;s capacity to assess quality beyond minimum compliance by developing a feasible approach for measuring, scoring, and comparing broader dimensions of healthcare quality, including safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centredness, and equity.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To test the practical use of the HQI within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions through a limited pilot that assesses feasibility, data availability, usability, and relevance for decision-making.</li></ul>
<ul><li>To recommend future institutionalisation and scale-up of the HQI by developing a practical roadmap that sets out how it may be used, maintained, reviewed, and progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing systems, subject to PHCC priorities, capacity, and decision-making.</li></ul>
</div>
<p><b>Strategic Approach</b></p>
<p><i>
Contributions to Health Systems Strengthening</i></p>
<p>
This TA aims to strengthen healthcare regulation and quality improvement in Punjab by supporting PHCC to move beyond minimum compliance monitoring towards a more performance-based approach to assessing healthcare quality. HQI will complement MSDS rather than replace it. The HQI will support evidence-based regulatory decision-making, risk-informed follow-up, facility feedback, benchmarking, and continuous quality improvement across private and public Category I and II healthcare establishments. Over time, it may also support hospital rating or public-facing quality information, contributing to greater transparency, patient choice, and healthy competition among providers.</p>
<p><i>
Alignment with Other E4H TAs / Investments</i></p>
<p>
This TA builds directly on the previous E4H-supported MSDS Impact Assessment conducted with PHCC, which tested an initial HQI model and recommended that PHCC complement MSDS compliance assessment with a broader quality measurement approach. The proposed TA therefore represents the next phase of support: moving from assessment and initial testing towards refinement, validation, operationalisation planning, and a practical pathway for institutional uptake of the HQI. The assignment also aligns with E4H&rsquo;s broader support to quality of care, evidence-based decision-making, health systems governance, and UHC by strengthening PHCC&rsquo;s ability to use regulatory and facility-level data for performance monitoring and quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>
Scope of Work and Methodology</b></p>
<p>
The TA will support PHCC to refine, validate, and prepare the HQI for practical application within PHCC&rsquo;s regulatory and quality improvement functions.</p>
<p><i>
Phase 1: Inception, Review and Agreement on Practical Application
</i></p><ul><li>Conduct a rapid review of the previous MSDS Impact Assessment, the HQI model developed, PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS tools, inspection processes, data systems, and relevant quality monitoring standards and practices.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the scope, workplan, timelines, roles, coordination arrangements, and PHCC focal points.</li>
<li>Agree with PHCC on the intended institutional application and feasible use of the HQI, including its use for internal regulatory planning, facility performance review, targeted inspections, structured feedback to healthcare establishments, quality improvement, and potential future hospital rating or public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>Confirm pilot scope, facility categories, sampling principles, data sources, validation approach, dashboard expectations, and institutionalisation requirements.</li>
<li>Ensure the approach is agreed with PHCC from the outset and reflected in the Inception Report.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 2: Refinement of HQI Framework, Indicators, Scoring, and Benchmarking Approach</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Review and refine the HQI framework developed under the previous MSDS assessment, including quality domains, indicators, scoring logic, weighting, data requirements, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>Ensure the refined HQI reflects recognised quality dimensions and is aligned with international best practice, while remaining aligned with PHCC&rsquo;s MSDS framework and regulatory mandate.</li>
<li>Review indicators for relevance, measurability, data availability, reliability, and usefulness for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Develop a practical scoring and benchmarking approach using MSDS requirements, previous assessment findings, facility category/type, available data, and feasible performance thresholds.</li>
<li>Submit and validate the draft HQI framework, indicator matrix, scoring methodology, and benchmarking approach from PHCC.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 3: Limited Pilot Testing and Validation
</i></p><ul><li>Pilot the refined HQI in selected Category I and II healthcare establishments, with the sample and selection criteria agreed with PHCC during inception.</li>
<li>Test indicator feasibility, measurability, data availability, data verification requirements, scoring practicality, dashboard usability, and relevance for PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Assess how the HQI can complement MSDS inspections and PHCC&rsquo;s existing regulatory processes without adding unnecessary burden to PHCC staff or healthcare establishments.</li>
<li>Gather feedback from PHCC teams and participating facilities on usability, interpretation, and practical value of HQI outputs.</li>
<li>Refine the indicator set, scoring approach, data requirements, dashboard structure, and implementation guidance based on pilot findings.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 4: Development of HQI Manual, User Guidance and Dashboard Prototype</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Co-develop and finalse a practical HQI package for PHCC, including the HQI manual, indicator definitions, scoring and aggregation rules, data source requirements, quality assurance checks, reporting formats, and user guidance.</li>
<li>Develop a simple dashboard prototype, in line with the approach agreed during inception.</li>
<li>Ensure the dashboard can present facility-level scores, domain-level performance, comparison across relevant facility categories, and priority areas for improvement.</li>
<li>Develop the dashboard as a practical, non-system-dependent tool or prototype for immediate use and future digital integration decisions.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Phase 5: Finalisation and Integration Planning</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Work with PHCC to define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into existing regulatory, inspection, monitoring, and quality improvement processes.</li>
<li>Request PHCC to share HQI with health care commissions in other provinces as well as the Islamabad Healthcare Regulatory Authority (IHRA) in close coordination with the TWG at the federal level responsible for regular coordination of HCCs.</li>
<li>Develop an implementation roadmap setting out rollout steps, roles and responsibilities, PHCC ownership arrangements, review and update frequency, data management requirements, and facility feedback mechanisms.</li>
<li>Identify options for future use of HQI results, including internal regulatory planning, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information, subject to PHCC decision-making.</li>
<li>Define practical requirements for sustaining the HQI beyond the TA period, including staff capacity, governance arrangements, dashboard maintenance, future refinement of indicators, and alignment with PHCC systems.</li>
<li>Conduct a structured validation, orientation, and handover session with PHCC to support support future uptake and informed decision-making on continued use.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Sustainability and Institutionalisation</b></p>
<p>
Sustainability and institutionalization considerations will be built into the TA from inception.</p>
<ul>
<li>PHCC focal points and responsible units will be identified during inception to guide the refinement, piloting, validation, and institutionalisation of the HQI. The intended institutional use of the HQI, approval pathway, and integration into PHCC processes will also be agreed at this stage.</li>
<li>The HQI framework, indicator set, scoring methodology, benchmarking approach, dashboard prototype, manual, and implementation roadmap will be developed jointly with PHCC to ensure technical relevance, ownership, and feasibility for routine use.</li>
<li>The TA will move from TA-led technical refinement during early stages, to co-led piloting and validation, and finally to PHCC-led application and review with TA backstopping. This phased approach will help ensure that PHCC staff are able to understand, apply, interpret, and update the HQI subject to PHCC&rsquo;s future adoption and resourcing decisions.</li>
<li>Orientation and hands-on support will be provided to relevant PHCC staff on HQI indicators, scoring, data requirements, dashboard use, interpretation of results, and facility feedback processes. The final roadmap will also identify any further training needs required for wider rollout.</li>
<li>The TA will define how the HQI can be progressively integrated into PHCC&rsquo;s existing inspection, licensing, monitoring, quality assurance, facility feedback, and performance review processes, rather than creating a parallel quality monitoring mechanism.</li>
<li>The final stage will include structured handover of the HQI manual, indicator dictionary, scoring methodology, dashboard prototype, user guidance, and implementation roadmap. The roadmap will set out recommended rollout steps, timelines, responsible units, review frequency, dissemination approach, and options for future use of HQI results, including facility feedback, hospital rating, and public-facing quality information.</li>
<li>The HQI will be designed as a living tool that can be reviewed and refined over time based on PHCC experience, data availability, facility feedback, and evolving regulatory priorities. This will provide the foundation for progressive institutionalisation and potential long-term use beyond E4H technical assistance.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Deliverables</b></p>
<p>
The tentative timeline to implement all phases of the are 8 months. The deliverable requirements from consultants are as follows:</p>
<div>
<ul><li>Inception Slide Deck and Work Plan: Agreed scope, methodology, workplan, pilot approach, PHCC focal points, agreed use of HQI, data sources, dashboard expectations and institutionalisation pathway</li></ul>
<ul><li>Draft HQI Framework: Refined quality domains, indicator definitions and matrix, data sources, scoring/weighting methodology, benchmarking approach, and proposed dashboard structure.</li></ul>
<ul><li>Pilot Validation Report: Findings documented on feasibility, data availability, scoring practicality, usability, dashboard relevance, and PHCC/facility feedback. Revised HQI framework, indicators, scoring approach, and dashboard structure updated based on pilot findings.</li></ul>
<ul><li>HQI Manual, User Guide and Dashboard Design: Including indicator dictionary, scoring and benchmarking, user guidance, data quality checks, and dashboard prototype</li></ul>
<ul><li>Final Report and Implementation Roadmap: Roadmap to include rollout and institutionalisation steps, PHCC ownership arrangements, responsible units, review frequency, training needs, dissemination approach, approval pathways, and sustainability measures and requirements for conintinued use.</li></ul>
</div>
<p></p><div><p><b>Position Title:</b><b> </b>Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert (Senior National)</p>
<p><b>
Duty Station:</b> Lahore (with travel as required)</p>
<p><b>
Duration / LOE:</b> July 2026 &ndash; February 2027 (LOE 96 days &ndash; subject to change until the start of the TA)</p>
<p><b>
Reporting To: </b>E4H Programme Punjab Team Lead &amp; Designated Provincial Coordinator</p>
<p><b>
Role Purpose</b><b>:
</b></p><p>Provide overall technical leadership and strategic oversight for the refinement, validation, piloting, and operationalisation of the Healthcare Quality Index (HQI) to strengthen PHCC&rsquo;s performance-based monitoring and regulatory decision-making functions.</p>
<p><b>
Key Roles &amp; Responsibilities</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Lead technical delivery of the TA and provide strategic oversight across all phases of HQI development and validation.</li>
<li>Coordinate with PHCC leadership and technical teams to ensure alignment with regulatory priorities, MSDS requirements, and quality improvement objectives.</li>
<li>Guide refinement of the HQI framework, indicator selection, scoring methodology, benchmarking approach, and pilot implementation strategy.</li>
<li>Oversee validation processes, stakeholder consultations, dashboard development, and institutionalisation planning.</li>
<li>Provide quality assurance for all reports, frameworks, manuals, and implementation roadmaps.</li>
<li>Support PHCC in defining long-term governance, ownership, and sustainability arrangements for HQI implementation.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Requirements</b></p>
<p><i>
Technical Expertise</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Master&rsquo;s degree in Public Health, Health Systems Management, or related discipline.</li>
<li>At least 15 years of overall professional experience.</li>
<li>Experience in health systems strengthening, healthcare regulation, quality assurance, or performance monitoring frameworks.</li>
<li>Strong understanding of PHCC MSDS and regulatory processes.</li>
<li>Experience developing composite indices, quality measurement frameworks, audit tools, or performance monitoring systems.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Core Competencies</i></p>
<ul>
<li>Strategic leadership and systems thinking.</li>
<li>Government stakeholder engagement and coordination.</li>
<li>Ability to translate policy into operational frameworks.</li>
<li>Strong analytical, report-writing, and presentation skills.</li>
<li>Results-oriented programme leadership.</li></ul></div></div><p></p>

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Senior Level National – Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert

Join Palladium Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited and explore 5   exciting career opportunities. They're hiring for various roles with options for remote or on-site work. Apply today and become part of their innovative team.

Palladium Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited

About Company

Ongoing Recruitment - (Junior National) - Logistics Officer – PPH Training Rollout

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Mid Level National – Clinical & Quality Measurement Specialist

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Junior Level National – Research Associate

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Mid Level National – Data / Dashboard & Digital Specialist

PN 35 – Ongoing Recruitment: STTA – Senior Level National – Lead Health Systems / HQI Expert